Skip to content
CYPRUS AI MONITOR
Cyprus
EN — EnglishΕΛ — Ελληνικά
PILLAR 6 OF 7

Adoption

The shares of enterprises with ten or more persons employed that use any AI technology, that use generative AI and that use two or more AI technologies.

pillar score
16/100
3 metrics · 3 tier A · 0 live
Show the exact score calculation16/100

How this pillar score is derived

Each value is converted to a metric score using its published reference band. The metric scores are then combined according to their relative weights.

Absolute reference bands · version 1.0.0 · in force from 7 Aug 2026

Enterprises using AI

AD-01.0 · Higher is better

18.5/100
Raw value
9.3 %
Reference band
0.0 % → 50.0 %
Relative weight
3.0/7.0
Pillar contribution
7.9 / 100

Worked equation

100 × (9.3 − 0.0) ÷ (50.0 − 0.0) = 18.54

Eurostat · · 31 Dec 2025

Why this reference band?

We set the ceiling at half of all enterprises with ten or more employees, the point at which using AI has become ordinary business practice rather than early adoption. The EU has no target for AI use on its own. Its Digital Decade target of 75% covers cloud, big data and AI together, so we do not use it as a ceiling for AI; we apply it only to cloud use (DA-01.0).

Enterprises using generative AI

AD-02.0 · Higher is better

11.3/100
Raw value
4.5 %
Reference band
0.0 % → 40.0 %
Relative weight
2.0/7.0
Pillar contribution
3.2 / 100

Worked equation

100 × (4.5 − 0.0) ÷ (40.0 − 0.0) = 11.33

Eurostat · · 31 Dec 2025

Why this reference band?

We set the ceiling below the AD-01.0 ceiling because generating language is one of the seven technologies in the survey. AI use in general can become widespread while only a minority of enterprises use this particular kind.

Enterprises using two or more AI technologies

AD-03.0 · Higher is better

16.8/100
Raw value
6.7 %
Reference band
0.0 % → 40.0 %
Relative weight
2.0/7.0
Pillar contribution
4.8 / 100

Worked equation

100 × (6.7 − 0.0) ÷ (40.0 − 0.0) = 16.83

Eurostat · · 31 Dec 2025

Why this reference band?

We set the ceiling below the AD-01.0 ceiling because the share of firms using two or more technologies can never exceed the share using at least one. The two bands therefore cannot be equal without making depth look better than reach.

Final weighted average

round((18.5400 × 3.0 + 11.3250 × 2.0 + 16.8250 × 2.0) ÷ 7.0) = 16

Exact result 15.99; published score 16/100. The calculation uses unrounded metric scores. The final weighted average is rounded to the nearest whole number.

Read the full methodology

Metrics in this pillar

value first, then score
Sources: EurostatDownload data
Enterprises using AI over timeAD-01.0
percent, annual. The vertical axis does not start at zero.
Enterprises using AI from 2021 to 202520212025CyprusThe vertical axis does not start at zero.
Source: Eurostat isoc_eb_aiUpdated

GAP TO PEER MEDIAN

  • Enterprises using AI−12.0 ppEnterprises using AI: −12.0 pp compared with the peer median
  • Enterprises using generative AI−1.8 ppEnterprises using generative AI: −1.8 pp compared with the peer median
  • Enterprises using two or more AI technologies−5.7 ppEnterprises using two or more AI technologies: −5.7 pp compared with the peer median
belowpeer median = 0above

Each bar shows the difference as a share of the metric’s reference band, so metrics in different units can be compared. The labels give the difference in each metric’s own unit.