Combined with machines, AI moves from the screen to physical work such as inspection and logistics.
KEY QUESTION
Can machines take on dangerous or repetitive tasks safely?
Priorities are editorial judgements by Cyprus AI Monitor about public value and the attention each sector needs. They are not official strategy rankings, readiness scores or EU AI Act risk categories.
A supervised robot or drone could inspect difficult-to-reach infrastructure, with staff checking findings before acting.
These are examples of possible uses. They do not describe systems already in use or promise any benefit.
Test stopping behaviour, human proximity and loss of connectivity in the intended environment. Gather separate safety evidence for physical autonomy.
Published figures for Cyprus. These supplementary measures are not part of the index score.
1.65%
Observation period:
Cyprus enterprises with 10+ people employed using industrial or service robots in the 2022 Eurostat ICT survey.
The figure dates from 2022, so it does not describe robot use today. The survey excludes finance and public services, and robots do not necessarily use AI.
€66.1 million
Observation period:
R&D expenditure in engineering and technology.
Includes research in every field, not only AI, in the government-controlled areas of Cyprus. Spending alone does not show whether research led to successful products or public benefit.
What we still need to know
The robotics figure is from 2022 and does not show current installations, their level of AI autonomy or their reliability. Engineering research covers more than robotics.
Proposed measures for future data collection. No values have been published for them.
Related source
KIOS documents facilities for testing connected and autonomous technologies. A listed research facility is not a count of commercial deployments or guaranteed public access.
Source or service page · checked 12 Sept 2026